By Mr Malcolm Chin, Partner, Minter Ellison, Hong Kong
 |
| Mr Malcolm Chin |
Since the end of the Second World War, arbitration, given impetus by international conventions, has evolved into the leading method of resolving complex cross-border or transnational disputes. As a result arbitration has become something of a growth industry, with jurisdictions increasingly vying with each other to promote their own arbitration regimes to the international community.
Traditionally European centres such as London and Stockholm have been at the forefront of this movement but now cities in Asia have joined them. While for example Seoul is making great strides, the two front runners remain Hong Kong and Singapore. By some measures Singapore is seen as having overtaken Hong Kong; for example it markets itself aggressively as leading the field in terms of the number of fully administered arbitrations it attracts. The Singapore International Arbitration Centre, SIAC, has certainly modelled itself to a degree on the
doyen of institutional arbitration bodies the ICC – with, some suggest, a price tag to match. But there are other measures of success. One of Hong Kong's strengths, other than its large pool of experienced practitioners and acceptability to the PRC and foreign investors as the preferred neutral venue, is the flexibility which it offers.